Key result
Acute baroreflex activation therapy decreased mean aortic pressure by 22.5 ± 1.3 mmHg (P<0.001) and increased aortic conductance and venous capacitance in anesthetized dogs.
Why the study?
Does acute electrical baroreflex stimulation increase venous capacitance and aortic conductance in an anesthetized dog model?
Does acute electrical baroreflex stimulation increase venous capacitance and aortic conductance in an anesthetized dog model?
Effect estimate: Decrease of 22.5 ± 1.3 mmHg
p-value: p=<0.001
Acute baroreflex activation therapy increases arterial conductance and venous capacitance while decreasing aortic pressure, even in the presence of vasoactive drugs, providing a mechanistic basis for its use in resistant hypertension.
Hypothesis-generating for baroreflex activation in resistant hypertension; requires confirmation in conscious models and humans.
We intended to determine if acute baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) increases venous capacitance and aortic conductance. BAT is effective in resistant hypertension, but its effect on the systemic vasculature is poorly understood. Left ventricular (LV) and aortic pressures and subdiaphragmatic aortic and caval flows (ultrasonic) were measured in six anesthetized dogs. Changes in abdominal blood volume (Vabdominal) were estimated as the integrated difference in abdominal aortic inflow and caval outflow. An electrode was implanted on the right carotid sinus. Data were measured during control and BAT. Next, sodium nitroprusside (SNP) was infused and BAT was subsequently added. Finally, angiotensin II (ANG II) was infused, and three increased BAT currents were added. We found that BAT decreased mean aortic pressure (PAo) by 22.5 ± 1.3 mmHg (P < 0.001) and increased aortic conductance by 16.2 ± 4.9% (P < 0.01) and Vabdominal at a rate of 2.2 ± 0.6 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) (P < 0.01). SNP decreased PAo by 17.4 ± 0.7 mmHg (P < 0.001) and increased Vabdominal at a rate of 2.2 ± 0.7 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) (P < 0.05). During the SNP infusion, BAT decreased PAo further, by 26.0 ± 2.1 mmHg (P < 0.001). ANG II increased PAo by 40.4 ± 3.5 mmHg (P = 0.001). When an increased BAT current was added, PAo decreased to baseline (P < 0.01) while aortic conductance increased from 62.3 ± 5.2% to 80.2 ± 3.3% (P < 0.05) of control. Vabdominal increased at a rate of 1.8 ± 0.9 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) (P < 0.01), reversing the ANG II effects. In conclusion, BAT increases arterial conductance, decreases PAo, and increases venous capacitance even in the presence of powerful vasoactive drugs. Increasing venous capacitance may be an important effect of BAT in hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burgoyne et al. (2014) studied Hypertension model (anesthetized dogs) (n=6). Acute baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) vs. Control (baseline) was evaluated on Mean aortic pressure (PAo) (Decrease of 22.5 ± 1.3 mmHg, p=<0.001). Acute baroreflex activation therapy decreased mean aortic pressure by 22.5 ± 1.3 mmHg (P<0.001) and increased aortic conductance and venous capacitance in anesthetized dogs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: