Key result
Increased compliance to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol was significantly associated with a decrease in morbidity (OR 0.96) among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate surgical outcomes with the use of the ERAS pathway and determine the association between compliance to ERAS components and these outcomes in elective colorectal surgery.
Does the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway improve surgical outcomes in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery?
Cohort (n=267)
No
Does the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway improve surgical outcomes in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery?
Implementation of an ERAS pathway in elective colorectal surgery is associated with decreased hospital length of stay and decreased morbidity with higher compliance.
May shorten hospital stays with ERAS in elective colorectal surgery; extends observational data but leaves open need for RCTs.
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate surgical outcomes (i.e. length of stay [LOS], 30-day morbidity, mortality, reoperation, and readmission rates) with the use of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway, and determine its association with the rate of compliance to the different ERAS components. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort of patients, who underwent the following elective procedures: stoma reversal (SR), colon resection (CR), and rectal resection (RR). The primary endpoint was to determine the association of compliance to an ERAS pathway and surgical outcomes. These were then retrospectively compared to outcomes prior to the implementation of ERAS. RESULTS: A total of 267 patients were included in the study. The overall compliance to the ERAS component was 92.0% (SR, 91.8%; CR, 93.1%; RR, 90.7%). There was an associated decrease in morbidity rates across all types of surgery, as compliance to ERAS increased. The average total LOS decreased in all groups but was only found to have statistical significance in SR (12.1±6.7 days vs. 10.0±5.4 days, P=0.002) and RR (19.9±11.4 days vs. 16.9±10.5 days, P=0.04) groups. Decreased postoperative LOS was noted in all groups. Morbidity rates were significantly higher after ERAS implementation, but reoperation and mortality rates were found to be similar. CONCLUSION: Increased compliance to ERAS protocol is associated with a decrease in morbidity across all surgery types. The implementation of an ERAS protocol significantly decreased mean hospital LOS, without any increase in major surgical complications. Having your own hospital ERAS pathway improves documentation and accuracy of reporting surgical complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tampo et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Elective colorectal surgery (n=267). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway vs. Conventional care (pre-ERAS historical cohort) was evaluated on Morbidity (association with percent adherence to ERAS protocol) (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.99, p=0.012). Increased compliance to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol was significantly associated with a decrease in morbidity (OR 0.96) among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: