Why the study?
The relationship between early recurrence within a 90-day blanking period after catheter ablation for AF and late recurrence in hemodialysis patients was unclear.
Does early recurrence predict late recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients compared to non-hemodialysis patients?
Does early recurrence predict late recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients compared to non-hemodialysis patients?
While hemodialysis patients have a higher overall risk of late recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation, those who do not experience early recurrence within 90 days have long-term outcomes comparable to non-hemodialysis patients.
Early recurrence may warrant intensified surveillance in hemodialysis patients after AF ablation; leaves open whether its absence equalizes long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients on hemodialysis (HD) is reported to have a high risk of late recurrence (LR). However, the relationship between early recurrence (ER) within a 90-day blanking period after CA in AF patients and LR in HD patients remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 5,010 patients in the Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation Registry, 5,009 were included in the present study. Of these patients, 4,942 were not on HD (non-HD group) and 67 were on HD (HD group). HD was an independent risk factor for LR after the initial CA (adjusted hazard ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.2; P=0.01). In patients with ER, the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance at 3 years after the initial CA was significantly lower in the HD than non-HD group (11.4% vs. 35.4%, respectively; log-rank P=0.004). However, in patients without ER, there was no significant difference in the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance at 3 years between the HD and non-HD groups (67.7% vs. 74.5%, respectively; log-rank P=0.62). CONCLUSIONS: ER in HD patients was a strong risk factor for LR. However, even HD patients could expect a good outcome without ER after the initial CA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onishi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: