Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study provides data on the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with either anterior cervical discectomy alone (ACD) or anterior cervical discectomy with intervertebral bone graft placement (ACDF). METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to 525 patients who had undergone ACD (290 patients) or ACDF (235 patients) at least 2 years previously. All procedures were performed by University of Nebraska Medical Center faculty in the Section of Neurosurgery. The follow-up period averaged 8.1 years, with a range of 2 to 14 years. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-two (49.9%) patients responded to the questionnaire. There was no demographic difference between respondents and nonrespondents (P > 0.05). Respondents who underwent ACDF reported fewer problems with pain than did those who underwent ACD (P < 0.05). A higher percentage of respondents with ACDF reported that they had normal function than did those who underwent ACD (P < 0.05). When limited to respondents who underwent first-time, single-level operations (191 patients), similar results were obtained for the pain parameter (P < 0.05) but not for the level of function (P = 0.25). Patients with longer follow-up periods had fewer problems with pain and better levels of function (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent ACD or ACDF did well and benefited from their operations. Those who underwent ACDF did better than those who underwent ACD. Length of follow-up was also an important predictor of current levels of function and pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thorell et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: