At the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia and Brazil were led by right-of-center leaders who have each been compared to Donald Trump. Nevertheless, despite their right-leaning political parallels, the pandemic responses of Australia's Scott Morrison and Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro were drastically different. Bolsonaro adopted a strategy characterized by denialism, the promotion of misinformation, and the politicization of healthcare, resulting in some of the world's worst COVID-19 outcomes. Meanwhile, Morrison largely pursued science-backed measures, including early border closures, rigorous quarantine protocols, supporting contact tracing capabilities, and implementing widespread PCR-based testing, which led to relatively low infection and death. This retrospective analysis highlights the significant impact of each right-leaning leaders' choices in navigating public health crises. This reveals that despite prevalent trends, right-of-centre politics can coincide with science-backed public health policy. It also underscores that even moderate adherence to science and responsible health policies can protect lives, regardless of political affiliation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: