Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article deals with fire as a metaphor of radical socio‐political change, focusing on the paradoxical relationship between mobility and immobility. It opens with a topological discussion where fire signifies an instance of ‘absolute immobility’, or, politically speaking, the ‘emergency break’ of the empty, chronological time. There is, however, a pharmakon‐like, aporetic dimension to fire. The article articulates this dimension in the context of nihilism, linking this to the sociology of mobility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bülent Diken (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: