Ca2+ binding and/or permeation via the CaV1.1 pore plays an important modulatory role in skeletal muscle performance, fatigue, and protein synthesis, despite not being essential for excitation-contraction coupling.
Highlights CaV1.1 pore modulation of muscle fatigue and size in mice; leaves open human disease relevance.
BACKGROUND: Ca(2+) influx through CaV1.1 is not required for skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling, but whether Ca(2+) permeation through CaV1.1 during sustained muscle activity plays a functional role in mammalian skeletal muscle has not been assessed. METHODS: We generated a mouse with a Ca(2+) binding and/or permeation defect in the voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channel, CaV1.1, and used Ca(2+) imaging, western blotting, immunohistochemistry, proximity ligation assays, SUnSET analysis of protein synthesis, and Ca(2+) imaging techniques to define pathways modulated by Ca(2+) binding and/or permeation of CaV1.1. We also assessed fiber type distributions, cross-sectional area, and force frequency and fatigue in isolated muscles. RESULTS: Using mice with a pore mutation in CaV1.1 required for Ca(2+) binding and/or permeation (E1014K, EK), we demonstrate that CaV1.1 opening is coupled to CaMKII activation and refilling of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) stores during sustained activity. Decreases in these Ca(2+)-dependent enzyme activities alter downstream signaling pathways (Ras/Erk/mTORC1) that lead to decreased muscle protein synthesis. The physiological consequences of the permeation and/or Ca(2+) binding defect in CaV1.1 are increased fatigue, decreased fiber size, and increased Type IIb fibers. CONCLUSIONS: While not essential for excitation-contraction coupling, Ca(2+) binding and/or permeation via the CaV1.1 pore plays an important modulatory role in muscle performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: