Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Understanding the nature of the interaction between small molecules and G-quadruplex DNA is crucial for the development of novel anticancer drugs. In this paper, we present the first data on time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy study on the interaction between a water-soluble cationic porphyrin H(2)TMPyP4 and four distinct G-quadruplex DNAs, that is, AG(3)(T(2)AG(3))(3), thrombin-binding aptamer (TBA), (G(4)T(4)G(4))2, and (TG(4)T)4. The anisotropy decay curves show the monoexponential for free H(2)TMPyP4 and the biexponential upon binding to the excess amount of G-quadruplex DNAs. The biexponential anisotropy decay can be well interpreted using a wobbling-in-the-cone model. The orientational diffusion of the bound H(2)TMPyP4 is initially restricted to a limited cone angle within the G-quadruplex DNAs, and then an overall orientational relaxation of the G-quadruplex DNA-H(2)TMPyP4 complexes occurs in a longer time scale. It was found that the dynamics of the restricted internal rotation of bound H(2)TMPyP4 strongly depends on the ending structures of the G-quadruplex DNAs. According to the order parameter (Q) calculated from the wobbling-in-the-cone model, we deduce that the degree of restriction around the bound H(2)TMPyP4 follows the order of TBA > (TG(4)T)4 > AG(3)(T(2)AG(3))(3) > (G(4)T(4)G(4))2. Especially, based on the maximum order parameter (Q) of bound H(2)TMPyP4 within TBA, a new sandwich-type binding mode for TBA-H(2)TMPyP4 complex was proposed in which both terminal G-quartet and T*T base pair stack on the porphyrin ring through pi-pi interaction. This study thus provides a new insight into the interaction between G-quadruplex DNAs and H(2)TMPyP4.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jia et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: