Why the study?
Structural valve degeneration is the leading cause of late bioprosthetic valve failure, but the role of Lipoprotein(a) in this process was unclear.
Does elevated Lipoprotein(a) increase the risk of structural valve degeneration in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement?
Does elevated Lipoprotein(a) increase the risk of structural valve degeneration in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement?
Elevated Lipoprotein(a) is an independent predictor of long-term stenotic or mixed structural valve degeneration in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves, suggesting a potential target for improving valve durability.
Elevated Lp(a) signals higher SVD risk after bioprosthetic AVR; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding practice.
AIMS: Structural valve degeneration (SVD) is the leading cause of late bioprosthetic valve failure. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] contributes to native aortic valve calcification, but its role in SVD is unclear. We investigated whether elevated Lp(a) is associated with SVD after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) and whether this differs between stenotic and regurgitant phenotypes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 174 bioprosthetic AVR patients with available Lp(a) levels over a median echocardiographic follow-up of 7.3 years (1372 studies). SVD was defined by VARC-3 criteria, and associations were analysed with Fine-Gray competing risk models. Lp(a) was evaluated categorically (≤ or > 125 nmol/L) and continuously using spline modelling. During follow-up, 40 patients developed SVD (22 stenotic, 9 mixed, and 9 regurgitant). The 15-year cumulative incidence was 51% with a median onset at 14.8 years. Elevated Lp(a) was associated with a higher risk of overall SVD (62% vs. 47%; SHR 2.06, 95% CI 1.09-3.91; P = 0.026) and specifically with stenotic/mixed phenotypes (SHR 2.57, 95% CI 1.26-5.23; P = 0.009). No association was observed with regurgitant phenotypes (SHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.19-3.92; P = 0.84). After multivariable adjustment, elevated Lp(a) remained an independent predictor of stenotic/mixed SVD (adjusted SHR 3.00, 95% CI 1.48-6.07; P = 0.002). Spline modelling showed a linear dose-response, with each 25 nmol/L increase in Lp(a) conferring 13% higher risk. CONCLUSION: Elevated Lp(a) is independently associated with long-term risk of stenotic/mixed SVD. These findings highlight Lp(a) as a promising biomarker of prosthetic valve vulnerability and support investigation of emerging Lp(a)-lowering therapies to improve valve durability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boute et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: