To the Editor: The inability to undergo apoptosis in response to chemotherapy and other external stimuli poses a selective advantage for tumor progression, metastasis formation as well as resistance to therapy in melanoma (Soengas and Lowe, 2003). Recently, Apaf-1, known to be critically involved in the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, was described as being frequently downregulated in melanoma primary and metastatic cell lines on protein and RNA by Soengas et al (2001), which was suggested as a therapeutic tool in melanoma treatment. A negative correlation of Apaf-1 to malignancy, drug resistance, and tumor progression in melanoma and other tumors has also been shown by other groups (Jia et al, 2001; Fu et al, 2003; Baldi et al, 2004). In addition, a higher frequency of allelic imbalance of the Apaf-1 locus in metastatic compared with primary melanoma was discovered (Watanabe et al, 2003; Fujimoto et al, 2004). In contrast to these studies, our experiments using the drug-sensitive parental melanoma cell line MeWo, and its various resistant sublines show that Apaf-1 expression is not related to apoptosis deficiency and drug resistance. We have analyzed Apaf-1 expression in relation to chemoresistance and apoptosis upon drug treatment in a well-characterized melanoma cell system (Kern et al, 1997; Lage et al, 1999; Helmbach et al, 2002; Wittig et al, 2002) of drug-sensitive and -resistant variants, all generated from a parental melanoma cell line by continuous drug exposure to cisplatin (MeWoCis1), etoposide (MeWoEto1), fotemustine (MeWoFote40), and vindesine (MeWoVin5) (Kern et al, 1997). In all MeWo cells, no relevant mutation of p53 was detected (data not shown). Drug-resistant variants differ with respect to DNA repair (Lage et al, 1999) and differential apoptotic response toward drug exposure (Helmbach et al, 2002). Apoptotic features have been analyzed at a corresponding cell survival rate (25% [IC75] and 5% [IC95]) upon drug treatment. In contrast to sensitive cells, a marked apoptosis deficiency was observed in etoposide-resistant cells including characteristics of apoptotic cell death such as DNA fragmentation (Fig 1B, lanes 3 and 4), PARP cleavage, and effector-caspase activation. In addition, cytochrome c release was strongly reduced and caspase-9 activation was not found compared with sensitive cells (Helmbach et al, 2002). Despite the significant apoptosis deficiency observed, there was no differential Apaf-1 expression on the protein level compared with sensitive cells (Fig 1A, lane 3). Although cisplatin-resistant cells expressed significantly higher levels of Apaf-1 than sensitive cells (Fig 1A, lane 2), caspase-9 activation as well as effector-caspase activation were slightly reduced (Helmbach et al, 2002). Furthermore, the final DNA fragmentation was not significantly altered in cisplatin-resistant cells (Fig 1B, lanes 1 and 2). Furthermore, in fotemustine-resistant cells, where no differential expression of Apaf-1 was observed (Fig 1A, lane 4), DNA fragmentation upon fotemustin exposure was markedly increased (Fig 1B, lanes 5 and 6). Vindesine-resistant cells exhibited a strong upregulation of Apaf-1 on protein level (Fig 1A, lane 5). But no apoptosis deficiency, associated with DNA fragmentation, could be observed compared with sensitive cells (Fig 1B, lanes 7 and 8). (A) Western blot analysis of Apaf-1 in whole-cell lysate of drug-sensitive melanoma MeWo cells (lane 1) and their drug-resistant sublines: cisplatin resistant (lane 2), etoposide resistant (lane 3), fotemustin resistant (lane 4), and vindesin resistant (lane 5). The monoclonal mouse anti-Apaf-1 antibody was kindly provided by Yuri Lazebnik. Equal amounts of protein were confirmed by detection of β-actin. (B) DNA fragmentation is induced at corresponding survival rates, 25% [IC75] (black bar) and 5% [IC95] (gray bar) in sensitive and resistant cells upon drug treatment using histone-associated DNA fragments (mono- and oligonucleosomes) released from nuclear fractions of drug-treated cells that were quantified using a Cell Death Detection ELISA (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were treated for 72 h. The respective drug concentrations are shown below the bars. Data were normalized against the control and interpreted as the nucleosome enrichment factor. Standard deviations were below 8% in all sets of experiments. Taken together, these observations demonstrate that in this melanoma cell system of drug-sensitive and -resistant variants, Apaf-1 expression does not allow to predict chemosensitivity, as was suggested by Soengas et al (2001) and Baldi et al (2004). Furthermore, apoptosis deficiency is not associated with reduction of Apaf-1. In contrast, there are two drug-resistant sublines (MeWoCis and MeWoVin) that show a strong upregulation of Apaf-1 on the protein level compared with sensitive cells. Both lines showed no significant increase in DNA fragmentation upon cisplatin or vindesine treatment compared with sensitive cells. Furthermore, two drug-resistant lines without significant differential Apaf-1 expression demonstrated different apoptotic activity upon drug treatment. Whereas etoposide-resistant cells present a marked reduction of DNA fragmentation, fotemustine-resistant cells show an increase. Our data strongly support the results of Zanon et al (2004), who investigated Apaf-1 expression in a large panel of human melanoma and assessed cellular response to several proapoptotic agents in tumors expressing or lacking Apaf-1. The authors showed that the response of various human melanoma cells to different apoptotic agents was independent of the Apaf-1 phenotype. We suggest that specific regulation of the apoptotic cascade is strongly dependent on the cell type and the apoptotic stimulus, and differs between different cytostatic drugs. Because of further apoptosome-independent apoptotic molecules, loss of Apaf-1 might be bypassed and does not necessarily cause apoptosis deficiency. Conversely, an increase of Apaf-1 does not automatically lead to drug sensitivity. The data presented here are results obtained on cell clones selected in vitro from a single parental cell line, and therefore they cannot be generalized. Nevertheless, these results clearly show no significant correlation between Apaf-1 expression in melanoma and malignancy. This is in contrast to several investigations in the recent past that showed reduced Apaf-1 expression with tumor progression. In our melanoma cell system, however, Apaf-1 levels are clearly not predictive of drug sensitivity, which suggests that the earlier findings cannot be generalized either. Finally, the influence of Apaf-1 expression on patient survival still remains as a critical question. This work was supported by a grant of Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, Scha 422/7-3).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Röckmann et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: