Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Literature review reveals distinct irritable patterns and high comorbidity rates in adolescent depression, indicating treatment must address underlying propagating factors.
OBJECTIVE: To review the characteristic clinical, illness course and risk factors to adolescent depression. METHOD: A literature review is provided with interpretive comments. RESULTS: The clinical feature profile is likely to reflect the rarity of melancholic depression, while the non-melancholic "irritable hostile" pattern appears distinctly increased. A "reactive depressive disorder" is rare in those who get to psychiatric assessment, while comorbidity (e.g. anxiety and personality disorders, illicit drug use) is the rule. Aetiological determinants and the prognosis generally more relate to comorbid factors than to depression per se. Predisposing and precipitating psychological and social determinants are considered, while the efficacies of varying antidepressant strategies remain unclear apart from those with an "anxious" or "irritable" depression where selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor medication has shown utility and where cognitive-behavioural therapy may be relevant. CONCLUSIONS: For the majority who develop adolescent depression, its expression and outcome appear more a reflection of the propagating determinants, most commonly anxiety and personality style. The clinician should determine a treatment plan that not only addresses the depression but which identifies and addresses the contributing features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parker et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: