Why the study?
To determine the optimal ultrasound evaluation options for visceral adipose tissue amount, considering investigation time, landmark visualization, reproducibility, CT correlation, and ROC characteristics across cardiometabolic conditions.
What is the optimal ultrasound method for measuring visceral adipose tissue compared to computed tomography?
What is the optimal ultrasound method for measuring visceral adipose tissue compared to computed tomography?
Ultrasound measurement of perinephric adipose tissue area and rectus abdominis-to-aorta distance are optimal methods for assessing visceral adiposity.
Ultrasound perinephric area and rectus-aorta distance may aid VAT assessment; leaves open CT validation and CHD/ED links.
The aim of the study was to determine the best options for the ultrasound (US) evaluation of the amount of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), taking into account the time spent on these investigations, availability of visualization of anatomical landmarks, reproducibility of methods and correlation of the measurement results with data obtained by computed tomography (CT), as well as the operational characteristics of the ROC analysis of the boundary values of the VAT amount in metabolic syndrome, arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease (CHD), and erectile dysfunction (ED). The ultrasound measurement of VAT of various localization was performed in 337 patients aged 18-65. The selection of the optimal options for the ultrasound measurement of VAT was based on the qualimetric analysis. For the ultrasound diagnosis of VAT, taking into account the integrative assessment of ranks, it seems optimal to measure the area of the lower part of perinephric adipose tissue, as well as the distance between the inner surface of the rectus abdominis muscle and the anterior or posterior wall of the aorta. Increased thickness of epicardial and pericardial VAT is typical for patients with CHD and ED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Пиманов et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: