Why the study?
Although initial registries showed high implantation success for the novel LAmbre device for LAAC, few mid-term results were available.
Does left atrial appendage closure with the LAmbre device provide safe and effective mid-term outcomes in high-risk patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Does left atrial appendage closure with the LAmbre device provide safe and effective mid-term outcomes in high-risk patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
The LAmbre device demonstrates high procedural success and acceptable mid-term safety for left atrial appendage closure in high-risk patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
May support LAmbre LAA closure in high-risk nonvalvular AF; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of mid-term outcomes.
The LAmbreTM device is a novel system designed for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). First registries showed a high rate of device implantation success. However, few mid-term results are available. We present our 1- and 12-month follow-up results for this device. This prospective, single-center registry included consecutive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAC with the LAmbreTM device. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed at 1-month follow-up. In total, 55 patients were included. The population was elderly (75 ± 9.4 years), with a high proportion of comorbidities. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.6 ± 1.6 and 3.9 ± 1.0, respectively. Previous history of a major bleeding event was present in 37 patients (67.3%). Procedural success was achieved in 54 patients (98.2%). Device success was achieved in 100% of patients in whom device implantation was attempted (54 patients). Major in-hospital device-related complications included mortality of one patient (1.8%) and pericardial tamponade in two patients (3.6%); the incidence of stroke was 0%. No thrombus or significant leaks (≥5 mm) were observed on 1-month TEE. At 12 months, adverse events were overall death (1.8%), transient ischemic attack/ischemic stroke (1.8%), and major bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3a and 3c; 11%). In this high-risk population, the LAmbreTM device seems to be a safe and effective option for LAAC with a remarkable mid-term performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Llagostera et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: