The idiotope-antiidiotope complex between the anti-hen egg white lysozyme antibody D1.3 and the anti-D1.3 antibody E5.2 provides a useful model for studying protein-protein interactions. A high-resolution crystal structure of the complex is available [Fields, B. A., Goldbaum, F. A., Ysern, X., Poljak, R.J., & Mariuzza, R. A. (1995) Nature 374, 739-742], and both components are easily produced and manipulated in Escherichia coli. We previously analyzed the relative contributions of individual residues of D1.3 to complex stabilization by site-directed mutagenesis [Dall'Acqua, W., Goldman, E. R., Eisenstein, E., & Mariuzza, R. A. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 9667-9676]. In the current work, we introduced single alanine substitutions in 9 out of 21 positions in the combining site of E5.2 involved in contacts with D1.3 and found that 8 of them play a significant role in ligand binding (delta Gmutant-delta Gwild type > 1.5 kcal/mol). Furthermore, energetically important E5.2 and D1.3 residues tend to be juxtaposed in the crystal structure of the complex. In order to further dissect the energetics of specific interactions in the D1.3-E5.2 interface, double mutant cycles were carried out to measure the coupling of 13 amino acid pairs, 9 of which are in direct contact in the crystal structure. The highest coupling energy (4.3 kcal/mol) was measured for a charged-neutral pair which forms a buried hydrogen bond, while side chains which interact through solvated hydrogen bonds have lower coupling energies (1.3-1.7 kcal/mol), irrespective of whether they involve charged-neutral or neutral-neutral pairs. Interaction energies of similar magnitude (1.3-1.6 kcal/mol) were measured for residues forming only van der Waals contacts. Cycles between distant residues not involved in direct contacts in the crystal structure also showed significant coupling (0.5-1.0 kcal/mol). These weak long-range interactions could be due to rearrangements in solvent or protein structure or to secondary interactions involving other residues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldman et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: