Why the study?
Non-pharmaceutical measures to control SARS-CoV-2 impose heavy social and economic burdens, motivating indicators based on historic and current respiratory virus prevalence to quantify and tune their efficacy.
Do non-pharmaceutical measures against SARS-CoV-2 reduce the prevalence of rhinovirus in hospitalized patients and outpatients?
Do non-pharmaceutical measures against SARS-CoV-2 reduce the prevalence of rhinovirus in hospitalized patients and outpatients?
Rhinovirus prevalence is negatively correlated with the stringency of anti-SARS-CoV-2 measures and could serve as an indicator for their efficacy.
RV prevalence may proxy NPI impact on SARS-CoV-2; leaves open prospective validation before informing policy.
BACKGROUND: Non-pharmaceutical measures to control the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) should be carefully tuned as they can impose a heavy social and economic burden. To quantify and possibly tune the efficacy of these anti-SARS-CoV-2 measures, we have devised indicators based on the abundant historic and current prevalence data from other respiratory viruses. METHODS: We obtained incidence data of 17 respiratory viruses from hospitalized patients and outpatients collected by 37 clinics and laboratories between 2010-2020 in Germany. With a probabilistic model for Bayes inference we quantified prevalence changes of the different viruses between months in the pre-pandemic period 2010-2019 and the corresponding months in 2020, the year of the pandemic with noninvasive measures of various degrees of stringency. RESULTS: We discovered remarkable reductions δ in rhinovirus (RV) prevalence by about 25% (95% highest density interval (HDI) [-0.35,-0.15]) in the months after the measures against SARS-CoV-2 were introduced in Germany. In the months after the measures began to ease, RV prevalence increased to low pre-pandemic levels, e.g. in August 2020 δ=-0.14 (95% HDI [-0.28,0.12]). CONCLUSIONS: RV prevalence is negatively correlated with the stringency of anti-SARS-CoV-2 measures with only a short time delay. This result suggests that RV prevalence could possibly be an indicator for the efficiency for these measures. As RV is ubiquitous at higher prevalence than SARS-CoV-2 or other emerging respiratory viruses, it could reflect the efficacy of noninvasive measures better than such emerging viruses themselves with their unevenly spreading clusters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitanovski et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: