Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions were determined during the first 3 years of cropping a Kairanga soil out of pasture, with either full cultivation or no‐tillage cereal establishment. The CO 2 emitted during cropping was compared with calculated methane production by ruminants grazing pasture at the site. Cultivation resulted in the loss of about 10 t soil organic carbon (C)/ha over 3 years but there was no change in soil C with no‐tillage cropping. Grazing of pastures at a high but sustainable stocking rate was calculated to produce 205 kg C/ha per year as methane (CH 4 ). No‐tillage cropping of this site therefore contributes much less CH 4 and CO 2 to the atmosphere than either grazing or cropping with cultivation. Using 20‐year global wanning potentials of 20 and 1 for CH 4 and CO 2 respectively, the data showed that ruminants grazing this site would have had more influence on atmospheric warming than cropping with cultivation did.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crush et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: