Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a low-GCT result is predictive of low birthweight and to identify the lower GCT threshold for prediction of fetal growth restriction. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 12,899 women who underwent a GCT (24-28 weeks). Women with a low-GCT result (<10th percentile (70 mg/dL) were compared to women with normal-GCT result (70-140 mg/dL). ROC analysis was used to determine the optimal lower GCT threshold for the prediction of growth restriction. RESULTS: Women in the low GCT had significant lower rates of cesarean delivery (18.7% versus 22.5%), shoulder dystocia (0.0% versus 0.3%), mean birthweight (3096 ± 576 versus 3163 ± 545) and birthweight percentile (49.1 ± 27.0 versus 53.1 ± 26.7) and significant higher rates of birthweight <2500 g (11.3% versus 8.5%), below the 10th percentile (8.3% versus 6.5%) and 3rd percentile (2.3% versus 1.4%). Low GCT was independently associated with an increased risk for birthweight <2500 g (OR = 1.6, 1.2-2.0), birthweight <10th percentile (OR = 1.3, 1.1-1.6), birthweight <3rd percentile (OR = 1.7, 1.2-2.5) and neonatal hypoglycemia (OR = 1.4, 1.02-2.0). The optimal GCT threshold for the prediction of birthweight <10th percentile was 88.5 mg/dL (sensitivity 48.5%, specificity 58.1%). CONCLUSION: Low-GCT result is independently associated with low birthweight and can be used in combination with additional factors for the prediction of fetal growth restriction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melamed et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: