Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effect of an in-plane anisotropy (such as occurs in orthoferrites due to the orthorhombic crystal structure) on the static and dynamic wall structure has been calculated for walls that are either parallel (ψ=0) or perpendicular (ψ=π/2) to the secondary (i.e., in-plane) anisotropy axis. The results are described in terms of a parameter η=Δ/2πM20, where Δ is the strength of the in-plane anisotropy and M0 the saturation magnetization. For ψ=0, the critical points of the static wall structure move towards the film surface as η increases. For ψ=π/2, they move towards the midplane of the film where they merge for η→1. For ψ=π/2, η≫1, an untwisted wall becomes energetically favored over the twisted wall. The critical velocity at which wall motion becomes unstable is strongly dependent on η. For η<1 the lowest velocity threshold is due to Bloch-line nucleation at a critical point, for ψ=π/2, η<1, it is due to punch-through of the already existing Bloch line. For ψ=0 the critical velocity generally increases with increasing η. For ψ=π/2 the nucleation threshold at first decreases with increasing η and then increases. The punch-through threshold is substantially independent of η. For η≫1 the critical velocities for a film are substantially the same as for an infinite medium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ernst Schlömann (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: