Why the study?
Does coronary slow flow impair left ventricular twist mechanics compared to normal coronary arteries?
Does coronary slow flow impair left ventricular twist mechanics compared to normal coronary arteries?
Coronary slow flow is associated with impaired left ventricular twist mechanics and global longitudinal strain, which correlate with TIMI frame count.
Coronary slow flow may impair LV twist mechanics; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
PURPOSE: Coronary slow flow (CSF) is a rare condition described as the delayed angiographic passage of a contrast agent in the absence of stenosis in epicardial coronary arteries. Left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic dysfunctions have been described in the presence of CSF. However, the effect of CSF on LV twist functions has not been assessed. We aimed to evaluate the effects of CSF on LV twist mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). METHODS: Twenty CSF patients (24-60 years) were enrolled according to the exclusion criteria. Twenty subjects with similar demographic characteristics and normal coronary arteries were the controls. Participants were evaluated with conventional echocardiography and STE. RESULTS: The general characteristics of the two groups were similar. LV twist, LV torsion, and apical rotation were impaired in the CSF group (P = 0.015, P = 0.012, and P < 0.001, respectively). Time to peak twist (TPT) and time to peak untwisting (TPU) were prolonged in CSF patients (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). In the CSF group, rotation-deformation delay was shortened (P < 0.001) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) was lower (P < 0.001). The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count was negatively correlated with LV twist, LV torsion and apical rotation (P = 0.002, r = -0.624; P = 0.002, r = -0.624; and P = 0.002, r = -0.632, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that LV twist mechanics are impaired in CSF patients. Worse LV twist parameters were associated with greater TIMI frame count.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barutçu et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: