Current three-dimensional formulations of field emission of (noninteracting) electrons are critically examined and compared. It is shown that the kinetic-theory description for the energy distribution of field-emitted electrons (FEED) can be brought into a complete formal agreement with the theory of Penn and Plummer (PP). The reinterpretations of the parameters in the PP theory enable us to demonstrate its relationship to a nearly-free-electron theory. It is shown that the claim that FEED measures the "one-dimensional local density of states" as defined by PP is an approximation which may neglect some possibly significant band-structure effects in transition metals. In FEED these manifest themselves in the contribution of states with reduced two-dimensional wave vectors differing from zero. The relationship between Penn and Plummer's theory and a recent, more exact application of Appelbaum and Brinkman's transfer-Hamiltonian formalism, by Nicolaou and Modinos is discussed. A new expression for FEED is derived from Feuchtwang's many-body theory of tunneling. The limitations of the kinetic formulation are contrasted with a complete transfer-Hamiltonian formulation such as Nicolaou and Modinos's and a more exact tunneling theory by Feuchtwang. It is shown that the kinetic theory does not allow for either inelastic tunneling or surface-band-structure effects. It is also shown that the kinetic formulation of FEED involves a "coarse average" over an appropriate "surface" plane of the local density of states in contrast to the more complete theories in which the FEED depends on the full spectral density.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feuchtwang et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: