Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Behavioral modeling demonstrates that generative AI shopping agents shift early customer journey stages through trust transfer, indicating contextual relevance can replace invasive personalization.
This study investigated the effects of upcoming generative artificial intelligence shopping agents (GAISA) on changes in consumer behaviour and the customer journey by applying behavioural reasoning theory (BRT) and trust transfer theory. Contextual relevance, time/effort saving, usefulness of advice, and perceived informativeness were identified as reasons for adopting GAISA, while perceived complexity, traditional barriers, privacy concerns, and perceived irritation were identified as reasons against. Purchase intention was found to form through trust transfer from GAISA to recommended goods, with customers’ tendencies towards algorithm use and recommendation target types acting as boundary conditions. This study extends BRT and customer journey theory by showing that GAISA replace customers’ roles in early journey stages, and by positioning contextual relevance as a privacy-preserving alternative to preference-based personalisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: