The recoveries of microorganisms in the Septi-Chek biphasic tryptic soy broth (TSB) and Isolator blood culturing systems were compared with the recovery in Septi-Chek biphasic brain heart infusion broth supplemented with the lytic agent saponin (L-BHIB; Roche Diagnostics, Division of Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.). A total of 5,096 TSB-L-BHIB blood culture sets and 1,778 Isolator-L-BHIB sets were evaluated. There were 435 pathogenic organisms recovered in 413 (8.1%) of the TSB-L-BHIB cultures, with 348 organisms in the TSB bottles and 370 in the L-BHIB bottles (P less than 0.05). Significantly more yeast isolates were recovered in the L-BHIB system (P less than 0.01). Terminal subculture of the L-BHIB system was required to detect 13 clinically significant organisms. Significantly more organisms were recovered in the L-BHIB bottles than with the Isolator system (P less than 0.001), including Torulopsis glabrata, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Pseudomonas species. The time required for detection of all major groups of organisms was the same in both comparisons. However, detection of microbial growth in the L-BHIB bottles required macroscopic inspection of the attached agar slide unit and the use of terminal subcultures after 7 days of incubation. The primary advantage of the biphasic L-BHIB system when compared with either the biphasic TSB system or the Isolator system was improved recovery of fungi.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murray et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: