Currently, the detection of human infection with Blastocystis hominis is usually based on the examination under a light microscope of faecal samples, either directly, as 'simple smears', or after some form of concentration. Whether short-term, in-vitro cultivation would increase the sensitivity of such detection remains a matter of controversy. Over 900 fresh stool specimens, from soldiers in the Royal Thai Army, were each checked for the parasite using three methods: simple smears; formalin-ethyl-acetate concentration; and cultivation in Jones' medium. Although 334 of the samples were found to be culture-positive, the parasites were only detected in 142 of the simple smears, and faecal concentration led to an even lower sensitivity (64 positive samples). In-vitro cultivation does seem worthwhile in the detection of B. hominis carriage in field studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leelayoova et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: