Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of one-point and four-point canes on postural sway and on the distribution of weight between the lower extremities and the walking aids in hemiparetic patients. SETTING: Flieman Geriatric Rehabilitation Hospital, Haifa, Israel. SUBJECTS: Thirty hemiparetic patients following a unilateral stroke, with moderate functional impairment, and 20 age-matched healthy subjects. INTERVENTION: Subjects were tested on two forceplates, which were placed at a 30 degrees angle from each other with the heel end of the plates separated by 3 cm. Each subject was tested under three conditions: with no cane, with a one-point cane, and with a four-point cane. Testing time was 30 seconds, and order of testing was randomized. OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight borne by the lower extremities and by the walking aids expressed as a percentage of overall body weight, and Sway Index indicating vertical pressure fluctuations over both feet. RESULTS: In both subject groups, the one-point cane did not reduce sway significantly in comparison with no cane, while the four-point cane reduced sway significantly in comparison with both no cane and one-point cane. Neither cane type affected weight-bearing on the paretic leg, while significantly reducing weight-bearing on the uninvolved extremity. Mean percentage of body weight on the four-point cane was significantly higher than on the one-point cane CONCLUSIONS: A four-point cane increases stability of moderately involved hemiparetic patients during stance more than a one-point cane. The noted shift of weight toward the walking aid does not adversely affect weight-bearing on the paretic limb.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yocheved Laufer (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: