Why the study?
Variable tidal breathing causes lung gas store changes affecting gas exchange measurements, and there is no consensus on a physiologically robust algorithm for breath-by-breath measurement.
The 'independent-breath' algorithm fails to conserve mass balance of O2 and CO2, making it unsuitable for widespread adoption in breath-by-breath alveolar gas exchange measurement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
IND algorithm may simplify breath-by-breath alveolar gas exchange; leaves open consensus on physiologically robust method for widespread use.
Tidal breathing in awake humans is variable. This variability causes changes in lung gas stores that affect gas exchange measurements. To overcome this, several algorithms provide solutions for breath‐by‐breath alveolar gas exchange measurement; however, there is no consensus on a physiologically robust method suitable for widespread application. A recent approach, the ‘independent‐breath’ (IND) algorithm, avoids the complexity of measuring breath‐by‐breath changes in lung volume by redefining what is meant by a ‘breath’. Specifically, it defines a single breathing cycle as the time between equal values of the / (or /) ratio, that is, the ratio of fractional concentrations of lung‐expired O 2 (or CO 2 ) and nitrogen (N 2 ). These developments imply that the end of one breath is not, by necessity, aligned with the start of the next. Here we demonstrate how the use of the IND algorithm fails to conserve breath‐by‐breath mass balance of O 2 and CO 2 exchanged between the atmosphere and tissues (and vice versa). We propose a new term, within the IND algorithm, designed to overcome this limitation. We also present the far‐reaching implications of using algorithms based on alternative definitions of the breathing cycle, including challenges in measuring and interpreting the respiratory exchange ratio, pulmonary gas exchange efficiency, dead space fraction of the breath, control of breathing, and a broad spectrum of clinically relevant cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables. Therefore, we do not support the widespread adoption of currently available alternative definitions of the breathing cycle as a legitimate solution for breath‐by‐breath alveolar gas exchange measurement in research or clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Girardi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: