Why the study?
Response to vasodilators at diagnosis impacts therapeutic options and prognosis in PAH, leading to the hypothesis that analyzing perfusion images before and during vasodilation could distinguish PAH from control subjects.
Does perfusion imaging during O2+iNO inhalation distinguish pulmonary arterial hypertension from healthy subjects?
Does perfusion imaging during O2+iNO inhalation distinguish pulmonary arterial hypertension from healthy subjects?
Perfusion imaging during O2+iNO inhalation reveals significant differences in vertical perfusion gradients, offering a potential imaging biomarker to distinguish PAH from healthy subjects.
Small-cohort perfusion imaging study in PAH is hypothesis-generating; larger prospective trials needed before clinical consideration.
Background Without aggressive treatment, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has a 5-year mortality of approximately 40%. A patient’s response to vasodilators at diagnosis impacts the therapeutic options and prognosis. We hypothesized that analyzing perfusion images acquired before and during vasodilation could identify characteristic differences between PAH and control subjects. Methods We studied 5 controls and 4 subjects with PAH using HRCT and 13 NN PET imaging of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation. The total spatial heterogeneity of perfusion (CV 2 Qtotal ) and its components in the vertical (CV 2 Qvgrad ) and cranio-caudal (CV 2 Qzgrad ) directions, and the residual heterogeneity (CV 2 Qr ), were assessed at baseline and while breathing oxygen and nitric oxide (O 2 +iNO). The length scale spectrum of CV 2 Qr was determined from 10 to 110 mm, and the response of regional perfusion to O 2 +iNO was calculated as the mean of absolute differences. Vertical gradients in perfusion (Q vgrad ) were derived from perfusion images, and ventilation-perfusion distributions from images of 13 NN washout kinetics. Results O 2 +iNO significantly enhanced perfusion distribution differences between PAH and controls, allowing differentiation between PAH subjects from controls. During O 2 +iNO, CV 2 Qvgrad was significantly higher in controls than in PAH (0.08 (0.055-0.10) vs. 6.7 × 10 −3 (2×10 −4 -0.02), p<0.001) with a considerable gap between groups. Q vgrad and CV 2 Qtotal showed smaller differences: –7.3 vs. -2.5, p = 0.002, and 0.12 vs. 0.06, p = 0.01. CV 2 Qvgrad had the largest effect size among the primary parameters during O 2 +iNO. CV 2 Qr , and its length scale spectrum were similar in PAH and controls. Ventilation-perfusion distributions showed a trend towards a difference between PAH and controls at baseline, but it was not statistically significant. Conclusions Perfusion imaging during O2+iNO showed a significant difference in the heterogeneity associated with the vertical gradient in perfusion, distinguishing in this small cohort study PAH subjects from controls. Trial registration Not applicable
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winkler et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: