Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The dimolybdenum alkyne complex [Mo2(μ-R1CCR2)(CO)4Cp2] 1 (Cp = η-C5H5; R1 = R2 = CO2Me) reacted with the 1,3-dithiole-2-thiones SCS2C2R2 (R = CO2Me, SMe, or SCOPh) to afford the new compounds [Mo2(μ-S)(μ-SCR CRSCCR1CR2)Cp2] by a complicated process involving cleavage of the CS bond to give a μ-sulfido ligand, ring opening of the heterocycle and coupling with the alkyne to afford a hybrid thiolate-dimetalla-allyl ligand. One of these products (R = R1 = R2 = CO2Me) has been structurally characterised. The alkyne complexes 2 (R1 = R2 = CO2Et) and 3 (R1 = R2 = Ph) furnished analogous products on treatment with SCS2C2(CO2Me)2 whereas 4, the dimolybdenum complex of the unsymmetrical alkyne PhCCCO2Et, gave two regioisomers, both of which have also been structurally characterised. Related complexes [Mo2(μ-S){μ-S(CH2)nSCC(CO2Me)C(CO2Me)}Cp2] were formed from 1 and ethylene or propylene trithiocarbonate, SCS2(CH2)n (n = 2 or 3). In contrast, the reaction of 1 with acyclic dialkyl trithiocarbonates SC(SR)2 afforded complexes containing sulfido (μ-S), thiolate (μ-SR) and CSR units, but surprisingly the last of these occupies the central position in the dimetalla-allyl ligand rather than the terminus. The crystal structure of one of these compounds, [Mo2(μ-S)(μ-SMe){μ-C(CO2Me)C(SMe)C(CO2Me)}Cp2], has been determined. Based on these observations, a possible mechanism for the reaction is suggested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: