This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Vacuum surface flashover at high voltage limits the development of vacuum interrupter(VI) towards high voltage and miniaturization. In order to improve the vacuum surface flashover voltage of the vacuum interrupter, the Al2O3coatings is constructed at the shield ring to suppress electron emission, and Cr2O3coating is constructed on the surface of the ceramic shell to suppress secondary electron multiplication by atmospheric plasma spraying. The effect of the coatings on the vacuum surface flashover characteristics is studied. The conditioning characteristics of flashover voltage and voltage-current waveforms under positive impulse voltage before and after coating construction are compared. The change of work function before and after the construction of alumina coating at the shield ring and the change of secondary electron emission coefficient before and after the construction of Cr2O3coating on the surface of ceramic shell were measured. The results show that the construction of Al2O3coating at the of the shield ring improves the surface flashover voltage of the VI. The insulation characteristics of the 40μm thick Al2O3coating are better than that of the 20μm thick Al2O3coating, but the vacuum surface flashover characteristics of the 100μm thick coating are deteriorated. The construction of Al2O3coating at the end of the shield increased the work function of the shield ring from 4.51 eV to 5.39 eV. Cr2O3coating along the surface of the ceramic shell reduces the maximum secondary electron emission coefficient of the ceramic shell from 6.4 to 1.49, thus improved the surface insulation characteristics of the vacuum interrupter.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: