A series of composites, some with permanent porosity, comprising polymers and ionic liquids have been prepared by in-situ polymerization. The characteristics of both composites and isolated polymers have been investigated. Slow mass and phase transfer characterize the interaction with a range of polymers ( 1 − 17 ) in the N,N ‘ -dialkylimidazolium ionic liquids, [emim]BF 4, [bmim]PF 6, or [omim]N(SO 2 CF 3 ) 2 . Free-radical homopolymerization of 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone in [bmim]PF 6 or of 4-vinylpyridine in [omim]N(SO 2 CF 3 ) 2 gave viscous solutions from which polymer ( M w = 162 500 and 71 500 g mol -1, respectively) could be isolated. Detectable ionic liquid residues were retained in the isolated polymers despite five reprecipitations from methanol. Copolymerization of 4-vinylpyridine (VP) with >5% divinylbenzene (DVB) or trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate (TRIM) in [omim]N(SO 2 CF 3 ) 2, and homopolymerizations of the cross-linking monomers on their own, led with 90−100% monomer conversion to a series of gel-like composite materials, B − H, from which cross-linked polymers, B ‘ − H ‘, could be isolated by Soxhlet extraction of the ionic liquid. Copolymers of VP with 5−30% DVB ( E ‘, F ‘) showed a low degree of permanent porosity in the dry state. However, poly(DVB) ( G ‘) and poly(TRIM) ( H ‘) have bulk densities (<0.6 g cm -3 ), intrusion volumes (>0.9 cm 3 g -1 ), BET surface areas (70−320 m 2 g -1 ), and morphology (from SEM studies) which demonstrate the porogenic character of the ionic liquids used. Comparisons with the related products I and J obtained in toluene reveal the sensitivity of these systems both to the properties of the porogen solvent and to the monomer used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Snedden et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: