Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acrylic/nano‐silica composite latexes were prepared by blending via high shear stirring (SS) or ball milling (BM) and in situ polymerization (IS). For comparison, composites filled with micro‐silica were also prepared. The mechanical and optical properties of the polymers formed by the composite latex filled with nano‐ or micro‐silica were investigated using an Instron testing machine, by dynamic mechanical analysis, ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometry and transmission electron micrography. The results showed that SS and BM methods could obtain better nanocomposite latex and polymers than the IS method, characterized by better dispersion of nanoparticles, higher tensile strength and T g for SS and BM than for IS. The increase in absorbance and reduction in transmittance of UV (290–400 nm wavelength) were observed as nano‐silica content increased, whereas the UV absorbance or transmittance basically were kept unchanged for the composites filled with micro‐silica.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiong et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: