Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of children with cystic fibrosis (CF) managed primarily at a tertiary cystic fibrosis centre (CFC) with those treated at regional centres by local health care professionals and the cystic fibrosis outreach service (CFOS). DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Retrospective study of 273 children with CF born between 19 October 1982 and 19 February 2002 and with clinical data available between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2002. Patients were grouped into CFC (n = 131) or CFOS (n = 142), with CFOS then further categorised into three groups depending on the level of care they received. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pulmonary function, Pseudomonas aeruginosa status, height and weight z scores, and hospital admission rates. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in pulmonary function, P. aeruginosa status, or height and weight z scores between children managed by CFC or by CFOS. Children receiving more care at the CFC (level of care [LOC] 1 and 2) were more likely to have multiple hospital admissions than children receiving more care in regional areas (LOC 3 and 4) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CFOS model provides effective delivery of specialised multidisciplinary care to children and adolescents living in rural and regional Queensland.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: