We used data from 162 lakes in northern Wisconsin during 1990–1999 to develop a stock–recruitment model for walleye Stizostedion vitreum and to identify important factors affecting recruitment. We used the linear version of the Ricker stock–recruit model and regression tree analysis to model age-0 walleye density, which ranged from 0.24 to 505 per km of shoreline (mean = 51.2). Adult walleye density ranged from .040 to 5.9 per surface hectare (mean = 1.5). The density of adult (sexually mature) walleyes, calendar year, and angling harvest rate of yellow perch Perca flavescens were significant descriptors of age-0 walleye density. Adult walleye density explained 10% of the variation in age-0 walleye abundance, which exhibited significant compensatory density dependence. Calendar year and yellow perch density explained nearly 32% of the residual variation in age-0 walleye density. The average age-0 walleye density in high-recruitment years (1991, 1994, and 1995) was 74.2/km, whereas the average age-0 walleye density in low-recruitment years (1990, 1992, 1993, and 1996–1999) was 38.5/km. Yellow perch harvest rates influenced walleye recruitment in low-recruitment years, as lakes with angler harvest rates of yellow perch lower than 0.79/h had lower recruitment of age-0 walleyes; in high-recruitment years, by contrast, yellow perch density did not affect recruitment. Combining data from many walleye stocks within a region allowed us to determine regional factors affecting walleye recruitment. The combined data can be used to develop walleye harvest forecasting models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beard et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: