Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Results of Hall-effect measurements as a function of temperature on a layer formed by hot, phosphorous (P31) implant in Si at 400 keV energy in a random direction are presented; the dose used was 1015 ions cm−2. The electrical behaviour of the layer as a function of isochronal annealing was examined. A detailed analysis of the measured quantities n 8eff, the effective surface density of free carriers, and μeff, the effective mobility, down to 4.2°K is presented using the integral equations: $$graphics$$ These formulae were solved numerically, the input data viz: the distribution of donor centres and compensating damage centres being assumed from the current literature. Results from this analysis indicate a rather complicated distribution of current flow in the layer as a function of temperature, indicating that the traditional interpretation of Hall measurements based on a homogeneous distribution model is of questionable validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacDonald et al. (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: