Experimental study reveals Angiotensin-(1–7) restores colon barrier integrity and dampens bone marrow inflammation in diabetic mice, indicating therapeutic potential for gut-driven diabetic pathology.
Diabetes promotes inflammation by compromising colon epithelial barrier integrity and upregulation of myelopoiesis in the bone marrow (BM). Angiotensin-(1–7) (Ang-(1–7)) is a cardiovascular protective peptide in diabetes. This study tested if Ang-(1–7) restores the colon epithelial barrier integrity and myelopoiesis in diabetes via restructuring dysbiotic gut microbiota and the BM-inflammatory landscape. Nondiabetic (ND) or streptozotocin-induced type 1 or db/db type 2 diabetic mice were treated with saline or Ang-(1–7). The intestinal permeability was evaluated by using FITC-dextran. Claudin1, occludin, Lgr5 + Olfm4 + intestinal stem cells (ISCs), Wnt3a and β-catenin were evaluated by immunohistochemistry or western blotting. Fecal microbiome was analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Monocyte-macrophages were characterized by flow cytometry. Plasma trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) levels or BM-cytokines were quantified. Increased intestinal permeability in both models of diabetes was reversed by Ang-(1–7) ( P < 0.001, n = 5). In db/db colons, Wnt3a and the active β-catenin levels were lower compared to the ND, which were restored by Ang-(1–7). Monocytes and pro-inflammatory macrophages were higher diabetic mice that were decreased by Ang-(1–7), which was accompanied by decreased pro-inflammatory factors, IL6, M−CSF, leptin and others, in the db/db BM-supernatants. Ang-(1–7) increased Bacteroidetes over Firmicutes with abundance of Lactobacillaceae and Akkermansiaceae in the db/db gut microbiota, and decreased the plasma levels of TMAO and LBP in the plasma. The study provides compelling evidence for the pharmacological potential of Ang-(1–7) in ameliorating diabetic disruption of colon barrier integrity and inflammation by restoring the regenerative ISCs and by reversing myelopoiesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chittimalli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: