Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the capacity of LACE+ scores to predict short-term undesirable outcomes in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery.
Does the LACE+ index predict short-term undesirable outcomes in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery?
Does the LACE+ index predict short-term undesirable outcomes in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery?
The LACE+ index is a viable metric for predicting short-term undesirable outcomes such as readmission and ER visits following gynecologic surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support LACE+ for postoperative risk stratification in gynecologic surgery; extends validation but remains hypothesis-generating.
BACKGROUND: The LACE+ index is a well-studied metric that compacts patient data in an effort to assess readmission risk. PURPOSE: Assess the capacity of LACE+ scores for predicting short-term undesirable outcomes in an entire single-center population of patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. IMPORTANCE AND RELEVANCE TO HEALTHCARE QUALITY: Proactive identification of high-risk patients, with tools such as the LACE+ index, may serve as the first step toward appropriately engaging resources for reducing readmissions. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis that used coarsened exact matching. All gynecologic surgery cases over 2 years within a single health system (n = 12,225) were included for analysis. Outcomes of interest were unplanned readmission, emergency room (ER) evaluation, and return to surgery. Composite LACE+ scores were separated into quartiles and matched. For outcome comparison, matched patients were assessed by LACE+ quartile, using Q4 as the reference group. RESULTS: Increasing LACE+ score reflected a higher rate of readmission (p = .003, p = .001) and visits to the ER at 30 postoperative days (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The data presented here suggest that LACE+ index is a viable metric for patient outcome prediction following gynecologic surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glauser et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: