Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Consideration is given to the impact of both synoptic-scale flow features and different model configurations upon the performance of an Alpine-encompassing regional NWP model. The so-called regional LM forecast model is used to simulate two events selected from the Mesoscale Alpine Programme (MAP), and simulations are undertaken with: different domain sizes (at 7 km resolution); lateral boundary data supplied from two data sets (the ECMWF's operational and MAP Reanalysis fields); and an embedded domain (at 2 km resolution). Quantitative evidence is provided showing (a) the specification of the incident and evolving synoptic-scale flow can exert a major impact upon the quality of the resulting simulations; (b) the simulation of the low-level meso-α scale features of the flow is helped considerably by the refined MAP Reanalysis data set; and (c) the simulated meso-β scale precipitation distribution displays some skill but, at least for one of the two cases, major deficiencies are not offset by the use of Reanalysis data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Didone et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: