Why the study?
DOAC switching often occurs in patients with NVAF, but limited data describe the economic consequences.
Does switching from apixaban to rivaroxaban improve cost-effectiveness compared to continuing apixaban in German patients with NVAF?
Does switching from apixaban to rivaroxaban improve cost-effectiveness compared to continuing apixaban in German patients with NVAF?
Switching from apixaban to rivaroxaban in German NVAF patients is not cost-effective, leading to higher costs and fewer QALYs compared to continuing apixaban.
Switching from apixaban to rivaroxaban raises payer costs in NVAF; leaves open whether outcomes justify switches in routine care.
Aim: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) switching often occurs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) for medical and nonmedical reasons. Limited data describe the economic consequences of DOAC switching in patients with NVAF. This study evaluates the cost–effectiveness and budget impact of initiating apixaban and switching to rivaroxaban versus initiating and continuing apixaban for patients with NVAF, from a German payer perspective. Materials & methods: Built on an existing model, a cohort-level lifetime Markov model was developed, including dynamic pricing assumptions to account for anticipated generic entry of DOACs. The modeled population (n = 1000) included German patients with NVAF, eligible for oral anticoagulation, who initiated on apixaban. The primary model outcome was the incremental cost–effectiveness ratio, assessed using cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and a willingness-to-pay threshold of €48,750/QALY. A secondary model outcome was a 5-year budget impact analysis. Results: Switching patients from apixaban to rivaroxaban led to 285 additional events per 1000 patient years, resulting in 0.079 fewer QALYs and higher total costs per patient (€21,357 vs €16,390 for apixaban continuers). In the base case analysis (with generic pricing assumptions), switching from apixaban to rivaroxaban was dominated (i.e., less effective and more costly) by continuing apixaban. In the budget impact analysis (with generic pricing assumptions), switching from apixaban to rivaroxaban led to additional cumulative costs of €490 per patient over 5 years. Conclusion: Despite the introduction of generic discounting, switching patients with NVAF from apixaban to rivaroxaban led to higher total costs and fewer QALYs under base case assumptions, meaning apixaban switchers were dominated by apixaban continuers from a German payer perspective. Switching patients from apixaban to rivaroxaban also led to greater budget impact over 5 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strakosch et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: