Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Twenty-eight audiologically normal adult subjects participated in a study designed to assess how well six noise-rating indices would predict the annoyance caused by 3-min recorded samples of traffic noise obtained from both nominally constant-speed and stop-and-go traffic. The study was performed in a laboratory simulating a home environment. Annoyance judgments were obtained through the use of a magnitude estimation technique involving a 10-point scale. Subjects were also asked if they could accept each of the 24 traffic sounds if heard on a regular basis in their homes. Data obtained indicate that the simpler noise-rating indices, such as the average sound level and the level exceeded 10% of the time, predict annoyance as well as, if not better than, complicated schemes incorporating a measure of either variability or rate-of-change of levels with time. Thus it appears that the measurement and computational burdens associated with these complicated schemes are unwarranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yaniv et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: