Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As you know, the board of directors for the American Statistical Association—the world’s largest professional society of statisticians—has actively promoted electoral integrity through election auditing, and risk-limiting audits in particular. In 2008 the ASA Board made a statement that said, “All processes and data of U.S. elections should be subject to statistically sound, continuous-quality monitoring and improvement.” Later that year, the Board endorsed Principles and Best Practices for Post-Election Audits. In 2010, the Board issued a statement on risk-limiting post-election audits recommending that “risk-limiting audits be routinely conducted and reported in all federal, most statewide, and at least a sampling of other governmental election contests.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1959 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: