Why the study?
Arrhythmia-mediated cardiomyopathy is commonly underdiagnosed, and the impact of catheter ablation of persistent arrhythmia on HRQoL, biomarkers, and clinical heart failure parameters in patients with structural heart disease needed evaluation.
Does catheter ablation improve quality of life, biomarkers, and clinical parameters in patients with structural heart disease and arrhythmia-mediated cardiomyopathy?
Does catheter ablation improve quality of life, biomarkers, and clinical parameters in patients with structural heart disease and arrhythmia-mediated cardiomyopathy?
Catheter ablation of persistent arrhythmia in patients with structural heart disease and arrhythmia-mediated cardiomyopathy significantly improves quality of life, left ventricular ejection fraction, and heart failure biomarkers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ablation consideration in arrhythmia-mediated cardiomyopathy; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Arrhythmia-mediated cardiomyopathy (AMC) is an essential clinical situation that is commonly underdiagnosed. Successful arrhythmia control leads to improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and heart failure (HF) symptoms in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). AIMS: The study aimed to evaluate the impact of catheter ablation (CA) of persistent arrhythmia on HRQoL, biochemical and clinical parameters HF in patients with SHD and AMC. METHODS: Patients with SHD, on optimal medical treatment, with persistent arrhythmia and strong suspicion of AMC, scheduled for CA were prospectively enrolled. Study procedures included: HRQoL measurement (the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire [MLHFQ] and the EuroQol Research Foundation [EQ-5D-3L] questionnaire), biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], troponin T [TnT], matrix metalloproteinase-9 [MMP-9], soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 [sST2], tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 [TIMP-1]), transthoracic echocardiography and clinical assessment. RESULTS: At 6 months, 30/35 (86%) patients were free of persistent arrhythmia. Patients who underwent successful CA had a significant improvement in HRQoL: MLHFQ (median [interquartile range, IQR], -22 [-28; -11]; P <0.001), EQ5D-3L score (mean [standard deviation], 21.8 (16.8); P <0.001); EQ5D-3L index (median [IQR], 0.09 (0.05; 0.18); P <0.001). A significant decrease in injury bio markers was observed: NT-proBNP (median [IQR], -414 [-1397; -318] pg/ml; P <0.001), TnT (median [IQR], -2.27 (-8.52; 0.55) ng/l; P <0.01) but not in fibrosis biomarkers: (median [IQR], sST2: 2.20 [-5.4; 4.3] ng/ml; P = 0.741, MMP-9: 34 [-376; 283] ng/ml; P = 0.881, TIMP-1: 11.1 [-17.1; 31.9] ng/ml; P = 0.215). There was a significant increase of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (mean [SD], 9.8 [5.9] %; P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Successful CA significantly improved clinical status, LVEF, and HRQoL of patients with SHD and AMC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: