Contour ridging can enhance the occurrence of deep seepage because more rainwater concentrates in the low areas along furrows when soil is saturated. Greater seepage could significantly increase nonpoint source pollution. To optimize the contour ridge system to effectively control nutrient losses under seepage condition, 23 treatments with three variables (row grade, field slope and ridge height) in five levels were arranged in a quadratic orthogonal rotation combination design. Results showed that field slope and interactions between the three factors did not significantly influence NO 3 ‐N and PO 4 ‐P losses. The dominant factor that controlled NO 3 ‐N loss was ridge height, followed by row grade. The smallest NO 3 ‐N loss was obtained at a ridge height of 8.72 cm and a row grade of 7.05°. The dominant factor that controlled PO 4 ‐P loss was ridge height. The optimal ridge height for efficiently controlling PO 4 ‐P loss was 9.79 cm. For simultaneously maximally controlling NO 3 ‐N and PO 4 ‐P losses, a ridge height of 9.26 cm, a row grade of 7.05° and a field slope of 5° were optimum. This study provides guidance for implementing the contour ridge system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juan et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: