Structuration and social identity theories

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore qualitative methodologies appropriate to a research project investigating the boundaries and scope of the information profession, with specific reference to the skills/knowledge base and concepts of “professionalism”. Design/methodology/approach Reviewed and critically evaluated here are social theory frameworks, focusing particularly on Structuration theory. Findings Strong Structuration Theory either singly or in combination with Social Identity Theory, appears to offer a sound methodology to explore concepts of change, conflict and professional identity, from both micro and macro perspectives. Research limitations/implications Strong Structuration Theory stands as a powerful tool in discovering reconstituted “boundaries along which professions can build new strategies of legitimisation” and remake themselves. Originality/value This review provides a critical evaluation of some of the current methodologies available to help define professional expertise.