Extended resection with vascular reconstruction for lung cancer invading the superior vena cava is feasible and provides effective tumor control with acceptable operative risk and survival rates.
Supports feasibility of extended resection in select patients; leaves open need for prospective comparative trials.
Between 1981 and 1991, 845 patients were operated on for right lung cancer. Among them, 50 (6%) had a tumor invading the superior vena cava (SVC). Fifteen patients (14 men and 1 woman, mean age: 58 years) underwent radical resection with concomitant vascular reconstruction. Two patients presented with a superior vena caval syndrome. The SVC was invaded by direct extension from the tumor (n = 11) or by paratracheal nodal involvement (n = 4). The patients required pneumonectomy (n = 13) or upper lobectomy (n = 2), with lateral (n = 11) or circumferential resection (n = 4) of the SVC. The venous pathway was repaired by direct suture (n = 9), prosthetic patch (n = 2) or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft (n = 4). Tumor resection was considered macroscopically complete in 12 patients (80%). One patient died postoperatively (7%) and non-fatal complications occurred in 3 (20%). Early patency of the four grafts was assessed by phlebography. In the late course, pulmonary embolism occurred in two patients and extended superior vena caval thrombosis in one; the overall clinical patency rate was 75.7% at 1 and 5 years. Two patients (13.3%) experienced mediastinal recurrence; the overall survival rates at 1 year, 2 years and 5 years were, respectively, 46.7%, 32% and 24% (median: 8.5 months). We conclude that extended resection for lung cancer invading the SVC, when feasible, is justified given the effective control of the primary tumor thereby provided, with an acceptable operative risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: