Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Palaeobiogeographical data on Cambrian trilobites obtained during the twentieth century are combined in this paper to evaluate palaeoceanographic links through c. 30 myr, once these arthropods biomineralized. Worldwide major tectonostratigraphic units are characterized at series intervals of Cambrian time and datasets of trilobite genera (629 for Cambrian Series 2, 965 for Cambrian Series 3, and 866 for the Furongian Series) are analysed using parsimony analysis of endemicity. Special attention is given to the biogeographical observations made in microcontinents and exotic terranes. The same is done for platform-basinal transects of well-known continental margins. The parsimony analysis of endemicity analysis resulted in distinct palaeogeographical area groupings among the tectonostratigraphic units. With these groupings, several palaeobiogeographical units are distinguished, which do not necessarily fit the previously proposed biogeographical realms and provinces. Their development and spatial distributions are broadly controlled by Cambrian palaeoclimates, palaeogeographical conditions (e.g. carbonate productivity and anoxic conditions) and ocean current circulation. Supplementary material: Global dataset of Cambrian Epoch 2 (A), Cambrian Epoch 3 (B) and the Furongian Epoch (C) trilobite genera are provided at: http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/SUP18669
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Álvaro et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: