Why the study?
Does the P532L polymorphism in the KCNA5 potassium channel cause drug resistance to quinidine in vitro?
Does the P532L polymorphism in the KCNA5 potassium channel cause drug resistance to quinidine in vitro?
A DNA polymorphism in the KCNA5 potassium channel creates a secondary structure that impairs drug access, explaining a mechanism for antiarrhythmic drug resistance.
P532L may confer quinidine resistance via C-terminal helix; hypothesis-generating for KCNA5 variants, requires clinical validation before guiding therapy.
Expression of voltage-gated K channel, shaker-related subfamily, member 5 (KCNA5) underlies the human atrial ultra-rapid delayed rectifier K current (I(Kur)). The KCNA5 polymorphism resulting in P532L in the C terminus generates I(Kur) that is indistinguishable from wild type at baseline but strikingly resistant to drug block. In the present study, truncating the C terminus of KCNA5 generated a channel with wild-type drug sensitivity, which indicated that P532 is not a drug-binding site. Secondary structure prediction algorithms identified a probable alpha-helix in P532L that is absent in wild-type channels. We therefore assessed drug sensitivity of I(Kur) generated in vitro in CHO and HEK cells by channels predicted to exhibit or lack this C-terminal alpha-helix. All constructs displayed near-identical I(Kur) in the absence of drug challenge. However, those predicted to lack the C-terminal alpha-helix generated quinidine-sensitive currents (43-51% block by 10 microM quinidine), while the currents generated by those constructs predicted to generate a C-terminal alpha-helix were inhibited less than 12%. Circular dichroism spectroscopy revealed an alpha-helical signature with peptides derived from drug-resistant channels and no organized structure in those associated with wild-type drug sensitivity. In conclusion, we found that this secondary structure in the KCNA5 C terminus, absent in wild-type channels but generated by a naturally occurring DNA polymorphism, does not alter baseline currents but renders the channel drug resistant. Our data support a model in which this structure impairs access of the drug to a pore-binding site.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drolet et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: