Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
Highlights the clinical distinction between COVID-19 myocarditis and vaccine-associated myocarditis, emphasizing the need for multimodality diagnostic approaches including high-sensitivity troponin, serial ECGs, and cardiac imaging.
Dear Editor, We are delighted that Dr Xianqiang Yu has written to us with a comment on our article about myocarditis after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines.1 It has recently been reported that myocarditis can be caused by COVID-19 and COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.1,2 As Dr Yu stated, COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis has a different clinical course and mechanism compared to COVID-19 myocarditis. Suspected cases of vaccine-associated myocarditis are characterized by onset within 2 weeks of vaccination in healthy young men. The cases of histologically confirmed fulminant myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccines show an inflammatory infiltrate predominantly composed of T-cells, macrophages, eosinophils, B cells and plasma cells,3 which is suggested to be associated with autoimmunity and allergies. It is important to distinguish between these two clinical entities. From the clinical perspective of vaccine-associated myocarditis, young men often show an early repolarization pattern on electrocardiograms (ECGs), making it difficult to diagnose accurately. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) showed no remarkable findings in our cases. Therefore, we emphasize that the diagnosis of myocarditis requires multimodality, including high-sensitivity troponin, serial ECGs, global longitudinal strain with TTE and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Finally, it is obvious that a final diagnosis should be made after ruling out the other potential aetiologies by considering a variety of types of infectious myocarditis (i.e. viral- (including SARS-CoV-2), bacterial- and fungal-induced myocarditis, etc.) and non-infectious myocarditis mainly caused by immunological pathways (i.e. drug-induced myocarditis, cardiac sarcoidosis, eosinophilic myocarditis and giant cell myocarditis).4 Conflict of interest. None declared.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Awaya et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: