Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Denmark, tetracycline resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes is frequent (>30%) whereas macrolide resistance is low (<5%). The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic background of tetracycline- and macrolide resistance in macrolide-resistant S. pyogenes (MRSP) and to investigate the correlation between the use of macrolide and tetracycline and macrolide resistance using international data. A total of 133 MRSP isolates were received at Statens Serum Institut from nine Danish clinical microbiology laboratories between. November 2000, and November 2002. The macrolide-resistance genes, erm(B), erm(A), and mef(A) were detected in 46%, 18%, and 32% of the tested MRSP isolates, respectively. In 4% of MRSP isolates, none of the MR genes were detected. Tetracycline resistance was found in 52% of MRSP. Tetracycline resistance was encoded by either tet(M) or tet(O). erm(B) and mef(A) were associated with tet(M). Sixteen different T types were detected among the 133 MRSP. Analysis of the importance of antibiotic use for development of macrolide resistance in S. pyogenes showed no correlation with macrolide use alone (p = 0.15) but a significant correlation (p = 0.03) for the combination of macrolide and tetracycline use. The frequency of macrolide resistance in Danish S. pyogenes was low and mainly due to erm genes. A high frequency of macrolide-tetracycline coresistance in S. pyogenes is found in many countries including Denmark, hence tetracycline use must be considered as a co-factor in selection of MRSP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nielsen et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: