The issue in Lot Streaming is how to split lots into sublots in order to improve the makespan (or some other criterion). We present a model and an iterative procedure for a general job-shop environment. The procedure alternates between solving a lot-sizing problem with a given sequence of sublots on the machines, and a standard job-shop scheduling problem with fixed sublot sizes. We report the computational results on a significant sample of 120 job-shop and flow-shop scheduling problems (including the famous 10–10). In case of no setup, in a few iterations, the makespan approaches a lower bound using very few sublots, suggesting that the procedure yields a global optimum. As a by-product, this result somehow validates the capacitated lot-sizing models in which the detailed capacity constraints, induced by the sequencing of operations, are ignored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dauzère‐Pérès et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: