Why the study?
Does a multigenerational family tree obtained by specially trained professionals improve the diagnostic rate of cardiac-inherited diseases compared to standard inpatient family history taking in idiopathic cardiology inpatients?
Does a multigenerational family tree obtained by specially trained professionals improve the diagnostic rate of cardiac-inherited diseases compared to standard inpatient family history taking in idiopathic cardiology inpatients?
Specially trained allied professionals taking a minimum 3-generation family history significantly increases the detection of cardiac-inherited diseases compared to standard inpatient cardiology team assessments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May increase inherited cardiac disease detection in idiopathic inpatients; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials.
OBJECTIVES: 'Idiopathic' cardiac conditions such as dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and resuscitated sudden cardiac death (RSCD) may be familial. We suspected that inpatient cardiology services fail to recognise this. Our objective was to compare diagnostic value of family histories recorded by inpatient cardiology teams with a multigenerational family tree obtained by specially trained allied professionals. METHODS: 2 experienced cardiology nurses working in 2 tertiary adult cardiac units were trained in cardiac-inherited diseases and family history (FHx) taking, and established as regional coordinators for a National Cardiac Inherited Disease Registry. Over 6 months they sought 'idiopathic' cardiology inpatients with conditions with a possible familial basis, reviewed the FHx in the clinical records and pursued a minimum 3-generation family tree for syncope, young sudden death and cardiac disease (full FHx). RESULTS: 37 patients (22 males) were selected: mean age 51 years (range 15-79). Admission presentations included (idiopathic) RSCD (14), dyspnoea or heart failure (11), ventricular tachycardia (2), other (10). 3 patients had already volunteered their familial diagnosis to the admitting team. FHx was incompletely elicited in 17 (46%) and absent in 20 (54%). 29 patients (78%) provided a full FHx to the coordinator; 12 of which (41%) were strongly consistent with a diagnosis of a cardiac-inherited disease (DCM 7, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 3, long QT 1, left ventricular non-compaction 1). Overall, a familial diagnostic rate rose from 3/37(8%) to 12/37 (32%). CONCLUSIONS: Adult cardiology inpatient teams are poor at recording FHx and need to be reminded of its powerful diagnostic value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waddell-Smith et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: