Why the study?
AF and VTE are major causes of morbidity and mortality, and real-world safety and effectiveness data for rivaroxaban in routine practice at a large tertiary referral center in Saudi Arabia were needed.
Real-world experience in a Saudi Arabian tertiary center demonstrates that rivaroxaban has bleeding and thrombosis rates comparable to those observed in major clinical trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support local rivaroxaban use; extends trial data to Saudi patients but leaves open randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) are significant causes of morbidity and mortality. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are as effective as vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) with a propensity to cause less major bleeding. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice in a large tertiary referral center in Saudi Arabia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, patients who received rivaroxaban at a tertiary referral hospital were included in this study. All adverse events were recorded, including major bleeding, non-major bleeding events, symptomatic thromboembolic events (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) and all-cause death. RESULTS: A total of 509 patients were prescribed rivaroxaban during the study period. The most common indication for rivaroxaban was non-valvular AF (65.3%) and VTE (34.7%). The mean age was 60.4 ± 16.4 years, and 50.8% were female. The median CHA2DS2-Vasc score was 2.1 in patients on rivaroxaban for non-valvular AF. Bleeding occurred in 72 (14.1%) patients, of which 20 (3.9%) had major bleeds. Thrombosis events occurred in 13 (2.5%) patients in the overall cohort. Fourteen (2.7%) patients died during the study, including a case of fatal bleeding secondary to rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: This study describes the use of rivaroxaban in a broad patient population in clinical practice in the Middle East. The overall bleeding and thrombosis rates in this study were comparable to those seen in major clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riazuddin et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: